Don't use plagiarized sources. Buy Custom Assessment Answers Now.
Mkt558 Group UITM Assignment example Malaysia
The Mkt558 Group Assignment is a very special assignment that is given to only the best students in each course. It is something that we would all do together if we were so inclined. We would be working on creating a group project that will be amazing and make our community famous. We are going to come up with some amazing ideas and put them on the wall for everyone in the class to see.
The mkt558 group assignment 1 is a challenging task that will require the Ferguson way of mind. The purpose of this assignment is to learn about how to live with focus, determination, and intensity to achieve success.
The mkt558 group assignment 2 is a creative work that involves working together to create a piece of art using only pencil, paper, and God’s voice. We will use the power of communication to communicate with each other and share our feelings so that we can build a powerful bond. We will also be looking for feedback from others in our group so that we can improve on this assignment.
Buy Mkt558 Individual Assignments Online From Malaysian Helpers
Download a free assignment example for mkt558 group uitm malaysia.
The Mkt558 UITM Group assignment Malaysia is a sample assignment that will help you to develop your marketability. It contains a variety of activities and tools that will help you to sell your product or service. You will also need to create a sales letter, make contacts, and so on. This Isagean company study found that those who were given the assignment felt more comfortable with their new life and had better job prospects than those who did not have the assignment.
Are you searching for mkt558 individual assignment website social media or mkt558 group assignment buy and sell service? Then our website is best, get connected with experts they would provide you with it and also get help regarding the mkt539 group assignment.
Anyone seeking mkt558 case study help then he/she must visit our website for availing the top experts regarding the help.
Assignment Activity 1: Explain the core concept of digital marketing.
Digital marketing is the process of designing, executing, and suffocating an advertisement. It involves creating an ad that is Worthy of Attention and making sure that it is seen by all who will see it. The task of creating and executing an advertising campaign requires a lot of thought and research because there are so many different aspects that go into the design, development, execution, and content-creation stages.
To be successful, advertisers must understand their competition, their target market(s), what resonates with our audience (our “core consumer”), why people might be Sword State students but not think about it too much, and change their tune about our industry in light of new information or global phenomena such as climate change; but most importantly – changing from a one-track journey to a multiple- Tracks approach will help us get where we want to be fast.
It is also associated with various digital media platforms, such as social media, email, search engines, and websites. The growth of digital media has made digital marketing the most powerful form of advertising. Even traditional channels are changing to fit more digital content into them, emphasizing its importance in a modern-day marketing strategy.
Download Mkt558 Group Assignments at Cheap
Assignment activity 2: display entrepreneurial skills in developing a business plan for a digital marketing business..
As an entrepreneur, you will be able to develop a business plan that applies the principles of digital marketing to achieve success. You will be able to identify and overcome any challenges faced by your business, as well as how to overcome them. You will also be able to understand what people want and need from your product or service, create a marketable brand, and determine whether digital marketing is the right tool for your business.
When it comes to developing a business plan for digital marketing, there are a few key things you need to keep in mind. In order from most important, the one with the highest priority list. The one with the list includes creating a website, chroming your software, and placing an advertising campaign.
You should develop a business plan that focuses on developing the skills necessary to develop a successful digital marketing business. You should research the needs of the digital marketing business and identify the specific skills and strategies needed to achieve success. You should create a Business Plan with taken-for-granted conditions so that you can be sure that no one can predict what will happen next or how things will work out.
Assignment Activity 3: Demonstrate autonomous learning about the use of digital technologies in the marketing mix.
By demonstrating that the use of digital technologies in the marketing mix can provide a unique selling proposition (LSA), marketers can differentiate their product or service from competitors. By using digital technologies in marketing, businesses can increase the level of engagement with their customers, generate leads, and measure changes in customer behaviour. Additionally, businesses that use digital technologies to manage customer data can get more out of facial recognition technology and cut down on human Data: Technologies for Evolution.
Schools use digital technologies in the marketing mix to communicate with customers about the products and services they offer. By themselves, digital technologies cannot do away with customer satisfaction; however, they can help schools and their customers develop a more effective relationship through automation. school students could be using computers at all times to access Digital Marketing content, which would then be combined with visual aids such as infographics to help students understand what is being said. This combination of technology and education could go on throughout the school system so that children from birth to pre-school are included in the learning process.
Take Help With Mkt558 Group Projects Online From Malaysian Helpers
Purchase mkt558 group uitm assignment help in malaysia.
Malaysia Assignment Help is a service that provides professional, personal, and affordable assignment help Malaysia services to college students in Malaysia.
Are you facing problems in your management assignments and seeking for management assignment helper online? Then we have the best experts on our website available 24*7.
Our essay helper Malaysia is a service that helps you to get your essay done quickly and easily. We are here to help you with everything regarding your essays. We focus on providing an easy way for you to get your essays done.
Our pay for online exam help is a great way to achieve a good grade on your online exam, as we have highly educated experts who will provide quality answers on time.
Private and Confidential
Yours all information is private and confidential; it is not shared with any other party. So, no one will know that you have taken help for your Academic paper from us.
11770+ Orders Delivered
4.9/5 5 Star Rating
Confidential & Secure
Group Assignment Help
Online Exam -Test & Quiz
Cheapest Price Quote
Diploma & Certificate Levels
Semester & FYP Papers
Summative & Individual
GBA & Reflective
Last Minute Assistance
Ask Your Homework Today!
We have over 1000 academic writers ready and waiting to help you achieve academic success
Sample Assignment Download
Bcm524 construction systems and analysis assignment example uitm malaysia, bsb151 material properties uitm assignment sample malaysia, recent reviews, literature assignment help.
I received great literature assignment help from malaysiaassignmenthelp.com. The writer was experienced and provided quality work. Thank you for your service.
Jeffrey , Sabah Universiti Malaysia Sarawak
Do my assignment on time.
Their writer was highly qualified and provided my assignment on time. I’m fully satisfied with their help service. I highly recommend their service.
Anis , Johor Universiti Technology MARA
Geography assignment help.
Malaysia Assignment Help provided me with great geography assignment help. The writer was knowledgeable and delivered the work on time. I highly recommend their service.
Aisyah , Perak Universiti Malaysia Kelantan
Perfectly written assignments.
I am very impressed with the quality of work provided by malaysiaassignmenthelp.com . The assignments are always perfectly written, with no errors or plagiarism. I will definitely use their services again.
Sufian , Kedah Universiti Malaysia Terengganu
Affordable prices and great quality.
I was skeptical about using an online service to complete my assignment, but this site exceeded my expectations. The prices were affordable, and the quality of the work was great. I will definitely use their services again.
Najmi , Kelantan Universiti Malaysia Sabah
UP TO 15 % DISCOUNT
Instant Paper Writing Services by Native Malaysia Writers
Get Assistance for Assignments, online Exam, and Projects Writing
Hugo Dewar 1957
The Moscow Trials ‘Revised’
Source : Problems of Communism , Volume 6, no 1, January-February 1957. Scanned and prepared for the Marxist Internet Archive by Paul Flewers.
For many years Soviet propagandists and pro-Soviet Western observers presented ‘Soviet justice’ as a forward step in the advancement of legal science. Thus, the British jurist DN Pritt wrote, in a contemporary eulogy of the Moscow purge trials of the 1930s, that ‘the judicature and the prosecuting attorney of the USSR [Andrei Vyshinsky] have established their reputation among the legal systems of the world’.  Pritt was not at all disconcerted by the singular fact, unparalleled in Western jurisprudence, that the accused in the Soviet trials did not raise a finger to defend themselves, but instead confessed with seeming eagerness to the most heinous crimes. The Soviet government, he blandly stated, ‘would have preferred that all or most of the accused should have pleaded not guilty and contested the case’. 
The naïveté, or wilful blindness, of such statements has long been apparent. As early as 1937, an independent commission of inquiry conducted an exhaustive investigation into the Moscow trials of 1936 and 1937 and found them to be clear-cut travesties of justice.  The commission’s findings were bolstered by an ever-mounting accumulation of evidence regarding the methods employed to produce the victims’ obviously abnormal eagerness to sign their own death warrants.
Today not even the most naïve apologist can continue his self-deception. At the Twentieth Congress of the CPSU the myth was broken for all time when Nikita Khrushchev, in a secret report to a closed session of the congress, revealed the depths to which Soviet ‘justice’ had sunk:
Stalin originated the concept ‘enemy of the people’. This term automatically rendered unnecessary that the ideological errors of a man or men engaged in a controversy be proven... The formula was specifically introduced for the purpose of physically annihilating such individuals... 
It is significant, however, that, in denouncing ‘violations of socialist law’, Khrushchev made no direct mention either of the show trial as such, or of its exportation to the satellites. His remarks about Zinoviev and Kamenev and about the ‘annihilation’ of Lenin’s closest colleagues as ‘enemies of the party’ were furthermore clear attempts to restrict the discussion to ‘violations of socialist law’ in the period following Kirov’s assassination in December 1934 – to the great trials and purges of the 1930s. 
This effort is a transparent indication that the present collective leadership cannot make a decisive, radical break with their Stalinist past. It is to Stalin that the present Soviet leaders owe their positions, and it was during his reign that their methods of ‘governing’ and dispensing ‘justice’ were decisively moulded. That is why Khrushchev and his colleagues will not admit that the genesis of the Stalin-type inquisitorial trial goes much farther back than 1934, indeed, as far back as 1922.
The idea of exploiting the judicial trial of political opponents for the purpose of ‘educating’ the masses was first given concrete expression in 1922, when a trial of 22 prominent members of the Social Revolutionary Party was staged. At that time the technique of the show trial had not been perfected, and only ten police stooges consented to play the role of cringing penitents and government propagandists. At first, the state was content with this number and even permitted the rest to defend themselves stoutly. They openly proclaimed their political convictions and even refused to recognise the court. Just prior to the trial, the Bolsheviks entered into an agreement in Berlin with representatives of the international socialist movement by which several prominent socialists were invited to participate in the defence; and in the early stages of the trial they were very active on behalf of the accused. As the trial progressed, however, the intolerable contradictions between accepted conceptions of justice and a Soviet-sponsored political trial were revealed. Bit by bit the essential elements of the show trial, with which the world later became familiar, emerged.
The presiding judge struck the keynote for the proceedings by declaring that the court would be guided not by objective considerations but by the interests of the government. During the course of the trial Bukharin declared the Berlin agreement null and void, and this, coupled with the prosecution’s obstructive tactics, caused the foreign socialists to withdraw. Perhaps most important in the development of the show trial, however, was the first utilisation of the technique of agitating against the accused outside of court. Yuri Pyatakov, the president of the tribunal, spoke at one of the mass demonstrations, as did Bukharin, who applauded the role played in the trial by the ten who had ‘confessed’. 
In the course of the next few years the show trial was gradually brought to a high stage of perfection. ‘Evidence’ was manufactured and, by means of inhuman tortures, the accused were brought into court ‘prepared’ to cooperate in arranging their own destruction. During the course of the so-called Shakhty trial (1928), for example, a group of engineers, personifying the ‘bourgeois specialists’, took the blame for the country’s chronic economic ills and accused foreign ‘interventionist circles’ of directing their sabotage.  By 1930 the technique had been further perfected, and during the Industrial Party trial every single one of the accused confessed to ‘planned’ sabotage in drafting or implementing the First Five-Year Plan. One of the witnesses, brought in under heavy GPU guard, was Professor Osadchy, formerly a member of the CEC (Central Economic Council) of the Supreme Soviet, and assistant chairman of the State Planning Commission. Incredible as it may seem, Osadchy, who was one of the prosecutors at the Shakhty trial, confessed to having plotted with the very men whom he had sentenced to death in 1928! 
Stalin’s speech at the Sixteenth Congress (June-July 1930) gave at least the outward rationale for all the great Moscow trials.  His thesis was that whenever the contradictions inherent within the capitalist system grow acute, the bourgeoisie tries to solve them by turning on the Soviet Union. By the bourgeoisie Stalin meant primarily foreign nations, but his main purpose was to justify the purge of internal opposition to his rule. The vast international ‘plots’ which were uncovered regularly involved certain native Communists; often these were among the most celebrated of the revolutionary heroes, their ‘crimes’ consisting in their opposition to Stalin’s dictatorship. Without respect to their previous service, these men were condemned as saboteurs working in collaboration with the outside enemy to wreck the economy of the Soviet Union.
Thus, the Great Purge, as well as the thousands of unpublicised local purges, served the double purpose of removing those who opposed Stalin and of providing for the population an ‘explanation’ of the continuing low standard of living. Vyshinsky made the point in the following manner:
It is now clear why there are interruptions of supplies here and there, why with our riches and abundance of products, there is a shortage first of one thing and then of another. It is these traitors who are responsible. 
Vyshinsky also underlined the connection between the various trials. Stalin’s thesis had been proved, he said: all the trials had uncovered ‘systematically conducted espionage... the devilish work of foreign intelligence...’. 
Characteristically, although it was ostensibly against Stalin’s thesis and its implications that Khrushchev railed at the Twentieth Congress, his anger was aroused most of all by the fact that Stalin’s wrath had been turned against the party itself:
Using Stalin’s formulation... the provocateurs who had infiltrated the state security organs together with conscienceless careerists... [launched] mass terror against party cadres... It should suffice to say that the number of arrests based on charges of counter-revolutionary crimes had grown ten times between 1936 and 1937. 
Khrushchev summed up the Stalin era in anguished tones:
In the main, and in actuality, the only proof of guilt used, against all norms of current legal science, was the ‘confession’ of the accused himself; and, as subsequent probing proved, ‘confessions’ were acquired through physical pressures against the accused. 
Khrushchev’s speech is a masterpiece of hypocrisy. To be sure, of the 1966 delegates to the Seventeenth Party Congress (1934), 1108 were arrested on charges of counter-revolutionary activity. But Khrushchev well knows that it was not a question of ‘subsequent probing’: every leading Communist in the Soviet Union knew at the time what was going on. They were aware that the ‘confessions’ were shot through with contradictions and obvious absurdities; they knew that the trials were frame-ups.
As a matter of fact, Khrushchev’s speech itself corroborates our previous evidence that the Politburo was well aware of what was going on:
At the February-March Central Committee Plenum in 1937 many members actually questioned the rightness of the established course regarding mass repressions under the pretext of combating ‘two-facedness’. 
Khrushchev thus confirms that opposition to Stalin’s iron-heel policy was expressed even within the Politburo. People who had employed the most despicable methods against both non-party and party opponents began to voice ‘doubts’ when the police terror menaced them. Among those who ventured to speak up in 1937 was Pavel Postyshev, candidate member of the Politburo. Indeed, Khrushchev said that Postyshev expressed his doubts ‘most ably’, as did Stanislav Kossior, a member of the Politburo – both were liquidated. Other prominent Stalinist victims of the monster they themselves helped create were Vlas Chubar, Yan Rudzutak, Grigory Petrovsky and Robert Eikhe: all men of the Lenin era who had thrown in their lot with Stalin in his struggle for power.
How was it, then, that Molotov, Mikoyan, Voroshilov, Khrushchev and others survived? They saved themselves either by keeping their mouths shut or, where their closeness to Stalin made this impossible, by sedulously fostering the cult of the ‘brilliant leader’. Certainly Khrushchev was not unaware of what was going on. Kossior, for example, was purged in the Ukraine while he was closely associated with Khrushchev.
Without speculating about the possible splits and rivalries within the top leadership of the CPSU revealed by the varying degrees of vehemence with which individual Soviet leaders condemned Stalin’s ‘cult of personality’, the central goal of the leadership as a whole is perfectly obvious. Khrushchev and his supporters are vitally concerned with ‘rehabilitating’ the party and strengthening its authority vis-à-vis the police apparatus. The terrors of the Stalinist era left party cadres either demoralised and spiritless or, much worse, cynically and brutally opportunistic. In any event, the leadership felt that the support of the new generation of Communists – the managerial caste and the intellectuals – required assurances that the days of arbitrary terror were over. In Khrushchev’s words:
Arbitrary behaviour by one person encouraged and permitted arbitrariness in others. Mass arrests and deportations of many thousands of people, execution without trial and without normal investigation created conditions of insecurity, fear and even desperation. 
The exportation of the macabre and revolting confessional trial to Eastern Europe was never much of a success. The process that had transformed the CPSU into a terrorised and docile instrument of the leader took 14 years; in Poland, Bulgaria and Hungary it was telescoped into less than four years – somewhat longer in Czechoslovakia and Rumania. During this time the weak satellite Communist parties (only in Czechoslovakia could the Communists claim any sizeable following) were deprived of their ablest leaders. It was clear from the trials, moreover, that these leaders were imprisoned and executed because they attempted to stand up to the Soviet Union and that the leaders who remained were mere Soviet satraps. The confession trials of ‘national Communists’ therefore destroyed what little basis the Communist parties had for claiming to represent national interests, or even the interests of the industrial workers. At the same time, they failed dismally to destroy either national sentiment among the people or Titoist tendencies within the rank-and-file of the Communist parties.
Quite on the contrary, there can be no doubt that the confession trials in Eastern Europe played a great role in enhancing anti-Soviet feeling and in undermining the Communist parties’ faith in themselves. The enormous crowds that attended the reinternment of Rajk in Hungary after his posthumous rehabilitation were symptomatic of the anti-Soviet mood that had been generated by the ‘educational’ methods of Soviet-inspired ‘justice’. The bloodless revolt in Poland and the heroic uprising of the Hungarian workers, peasants and intellectuals were due in large part to the exposure of Soviet methods and aims which resulted from the export of the ‘modern inquisition’. The people of the satellite nations share with the Russian people a deep and bitter hatred of the secret police, and a deathless desire to end the insufferable horrors which the confession trial represented.
That the Soviet leaders were, and remain, keenly aware of this was implicit in their repudiation at the Twentieth Congress of the Stalinist inquisition and in the gradual steps that have been instituted to correct some of the more objectionable features of the police and judicial apparatus. They obviously are attempting to restore public confidence in a party and system that had become thoroughly and openly compromised. In so doing, however, they paradoxically underlined still further the bankruptcy of the system that claimed to have produced that ‘glorious workers’ paradise’, the ‘most advanced country in the world’, and they reveal nakedly their inability to cast off the imprint of this system of terror and ‘educational justice’.
1. DN Pritt, The Moscow Trial Was Fair (Russia Today, London, nd).
2. DN Pritt, The Zinoviev Trial (Gollancz, London, 1936).
3. This Commission was headed by the noted American philosopher, John Dewey. Its findings were published in two books: The Case of Leon Trotsky (Secker and Warburg, London, 1937); and Not Guilty (Secker and Warburg, London, 1938).
4. The Anti-Stalin Campaign and International Communism: A Selection Of Documents (Columbia University Press, New York, 1956), p. 13.
5. For a full discussion of these trials see this author’s The Modern Inquisition (Allan Wingate, London, 1953).
6. The most complete record of this trial is in VS Voitinski, The Twelve Who Are About To Die (Delegation of the Party of Socialists-Revolutionists, Berlin, 1922). The death sentences passed against the accused were never carried out.
7. No official records of this trial have been published. Of secondary sources, the best are HH Tiltman, The Terror in Europe (Frederick A Stokes, New York, 1932); and Eugene Lyons, Assignment in Utopia (Harcourt, Brace, New York, 1937), especially pp. 114-33.
8. Andrew Rothstein (ed), Wreckers on Trial (Modern Books, London, 1931).
9. Some of the sources on the most important Moscow trials are the following: on the 1931 Menshevik trial – The Menshevik Trial (Modern Books, London, 1931); on the 1933 Metropolitan-Vickers Industrial Company Trial – The Case of NP Vitvitsky... [and others] Charged With Wrecking Activities at Power Stations in the Soviet Union (three volumes, State Law Publishing House, Moscow, 1933); on the 1936 trial – The Case of the Trotskyite – Zinovievite Terrorist Centre (People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, Moscow, 1936); on the 1937 trial – Report of Court Proceedings in the Case of the Anti-Soviet Trotskyite Centre (People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, Moscow, 1937); on the 1938 trial – Report of Court Proceedings in the Case of the Anti-Soviet ‘Bloc of Rights and Trotskyites ’ (People’s Commissariat of Justice of the USSR, Moscow, 1938).
10. Report of Court Proceedings in the Case of the Anti-Soviet ‘Bloc of Rights and Trotskyites ’, pp. 636-37.
11. Report of Court Proceedings in the Case of the Anti-Soviet ‘Bloc of Rights and Trotskyites ’, pp. 636-37.
12. The Anti-Stalin Campaign , p. 30.
13. The Anti-Stalin Campaign , p. 12.
14. The Anti-Stalin Campaign , p. 29.
15. The Anti-Stalin Campaign , p. 14.
Hugo Dewar Archive
Things to Do in Elektrostal, Russia - Elektrostal Attractions
Things to do in elektrostal.
- Good for Kids
- Good for a Rainy Day
- Good for Couples
- Good for Big Groups
- Honeymoon spot
- Good for Adrenaline Seekers
- Hidden Gems
- Things to do ranked using Tripadvisor data including reviews, ratings, photos, and popularity.
1. Electrostal History and Art Museum
2. Statue of Lenin
3. museum and exhibition center.
4. Park of Culture and Leisure
5. Museum of Labor Glory
7. Galereya Kino
8. viki cinema, 9. smokygrove.
11. papa lounge bar, 12. karaoke bar.
- Statue of Lenin
- Electrostal History and Art Museum
- Park of Culture and Leisure
- Museum and Exhibition Center
- Museum of Labor Glory
Elektrostal Attractions Information
EURO 2024 final tournament draw pots confirmed
Wednesday, November 22, 2023
The pots have been confirmed for the UEFA EURO 2024 final tournament draw in Hamburg on Saturday 2 December.
Article top media content
The UEFA EURO 2024 final tournament draw takes place in Hamburg on Saturday 2 December – the four pots have now been confirmed.
Germany (hosts) Portugal France Spain Belgium England
Hungary Türkiye Romania Denmark Albania Austria
Netherlands Scotland Croatia Slovenia Slovakia Czechia
Italy Serbia Switzerland Play-off winner A Play-off winner B Play-off winner C
How were the draw pots determined?
Hosts Germany are seeded in Pot 1 and automatically allocated to Group A in position A1. The three eventual play-off winners have been assigned to Pot 4.
The other 20 contenders have been allocated to a pot in accordance with their results in the qualifying group stage .
In accordance with Article 23 of the official regulations , seedings are based on overall European Qualifiers rankings, which were determined as follows (results against teams in sixth place were discarded):
a) final position in a group b) points c) goal difference d) goals scored e) away goals scored f) number of wins g) number of away wins h) lower disciplinary points total (3 points for red card including for second booking, 1 point for single yellow card for a player in a match) i) position in overall UEFA Nations League rankings
How does the EURO 2024 draw work?
A further six pots (A, B, C, D, E, F) are required to draw the respective team’s position in each group. Pots B-F contain four balls each to represent the positions available in each group (eg B1, B2, B3 and B4). Pot A contains only three balls for the positions A2, A3 and A4 in Group A, since Germany will occupy position A1.
The draw will be streamed live on UEFA.com and the official UEFA EURO 2024 app from 18:00 CET on Saturday 2 December.